English

Leo M. Frank, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Georgia, Defendant in Error. In Error from Fulton Superior Court at the July Term 1913. Brief of Evidence 1913.

Leo M. Frank, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Georgia, Defendant in Error. In Error from Fulton Superior Court at the July Term 1913. Brief of Evidence 1913. Defenders of Leo Frank have long held on to the position that without the testimony of Jim Conley, there never would have been a conviction for Leo Frank. However the truth is, it was Monteen Stover who sparked the chain of events, that led to Leo Frank's astonishing trial statement admission on August 18, 1913, that ultimately sealed his fate and ensured an easy conviction. How to Solve the Mary Phagan Murder Mystery Pay special attention to State's Exhibit B (Leo Frank's statement to police on Monday Morning, April 28, 1913) regarding when Leo Frank formerly stated Mary Phagan had entered his office on April 26, 1913, between 12:05 pm and 12:10 pm, maybe 12:07 pm; Monteen Stover's Testimony about finding Leo Frank's office empty on April 26, 1913, between 12:05 pm and 12:10 pm; and Leo Frank's August 18, 1913, response to Monteen Stover's testimony, explaining why his office was empty on April 26, 1913, between 12:05 pm and 12:10 pm, with a supposed "unconscious" visit to toilets in the metal room. Jim Conley stated to the

Sign in with your free account to read, download EPUBs or listen.